Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Several issues and concerns populate corporate counsels' minds when confronted with e-discovery demands, but two rise to the top: 1) collection and production cost; and 2) inadvertently producing information protected by evidentiary privileges. And these two concerns overlap, producing a Catch-22 dilemma for in-house lawyers. On the one hand, a complete pre-production privilege review of documents constitutes the highest-cost item in the e-discovery process. On the other hand, producing documents with limited to no privilege review risks inadvertent disclosures and privilege waiver, which may result is disastrous ethical and strategy-related consequences.
Many thought that courts' approval of lenient inadvertent disclosure rules and nonwaiver, or clawback, agreements would solve this double-edged problem. But neither avenue proved acceptable in practice. Some courts still found privilege waiver when documents were mistakenly disclosed without acceptable safeguards; and other courts ruled that clawback agreements did not obviate a pre-production privilege review and were not enforceable against third parties in subsequent litigation. And in these situations, parties were neither saving production-associated costs nor protecting their privileged information from discovery.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.
Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights
“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.
'Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel is a continuation of the discussion of client expectations and the disconnect that often occurs. And although the outside attorneys should be pursuing how inside-counsel actually think, inside counsel should make an effort to impart this information without waiting to be asked.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.