Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In last month's issue, we discussed at length how, when the value of a business interest is impacted by adverse events subsequent to the date of commencement outside of the titled spouse's control, courts have recognized that it would be inequitable to ascribe a date-of-commencement value. Let us now address two other scenarios where valuing a business interest as of the commencement date value would unfairly prejudice one party because the change in value is in no way attributable to the titled spouse's active efforts. In both scenarios, courts have appropriately valued the business interest as of a date subsequent to the date the action was commenced. First is the situation in which the value of the interest either increases or decreases as a result of passive market forces. And second, courts have valued business interests as of a date later than the date of commencement if the value is increased due to the efforts and contributions of the non-titled spouse.
Passive Market Forces or The Efforts of the Non-Titled Spouse
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.