Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

The Bankruptcy StrategistLJN NewslettersNewsSections

The Champerty Doctrine Under New York Law

By Jeffrey Gross and Nathaniel J. Palmer

A recent New York case demonstrates that the common law doctrine of champerty still poses a threat to the market for distressed debt. Historically, this doctrine barred litigation brought by assignees. In recent years, New York courts and the Legislature have restricted its ambit, thereby encouraging the development of secondary debt markets. This more limited application of the champerty doctrine has enabled buyers of distressed debt to pursue litigation, if necessary, as assignees.

But the champerty doctrine is not dead yet. In Justinian Capital, SPC v. WestLB AG, 952 N.Y.S.2d 725 (Sup. Ct. N.Y. Cty. Aug. 15, 2012), a New York trial court stayed a claims trader's causes of action pending further discovery about the merits of a champerty defense. On what it deemed to be an issue of first impression, the court characterized plaintiff's claims as a “scheme” to wage “litigation by proxy in exchange for a fee.” Id. at 733. Whatever the outcome of future discovery in this case, this decision is noteworthy for participants in the market for distressed debt.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Beach Boys Songs Written Decades Ago Triggered Current Quarrel With Lawyers Image

There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Transfer Tax Implications on Real Property Leases Image

The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.