Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

The Rights and Treatment of Non-Debtor Contract Counterparties in Bankruptcy

By Adam L. Rosen and Christopher J. Rubino
January 30, 2013

Bankruptcy Code ' 365 primarily concerns whether a debtor-in-possession or trustee may assume or reject executory contracts and unexpired leases (collectively, the “Contracts”) for the benefit of the estate, but the section often places the counterparties to those Contracts in the precarious position of being required to perform while running the risk that a debtor or trustee might not do so. Until a debtor decides whether to assume or reject a Contract, the terms of the Contract continue to bind the debtor and the counterparty. If the counterparty performs, it bears the risk that the debtor will reject the Contract and the debtor will be unable to pay the administrative claim owing to the counterparty for its post-petition performance. Courts generally struggle with this tension between protecting counterparties and protecting the bankruptcy estate prior to the assumption or rejection decision.

Counterparties have several available options depending on whether a pre-petition default exists under the Contract, and depending on the terms of the Contract. This article discusses how counterparties, as well as courts, react to situations where a counterparty seeks protection from the risks inherent in continued performance under a Contract with a debtor in bankruptcy.

Read These Next
Law Firms are Reducing Redundant Real Estate by Bringing Support Services Back to the Office Image

A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.

Bit Parts Image

Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights

Risks of “Baseball Arbitration” in Resolving Real Estate Disputes Image

“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.

Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel Image

'Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel is a continuation of the discussion of client expectations and the disconnect that often occurs. And although the outside attorneys should be pursuing how inside-counsel actually think, inside counsel should make an effort to impart this information without waiting to be asked.

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.