Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Consistency in the interpretation and application of frequently used language and constructs in acquisition agreements is certainly a key element in giving corporate dealmakers the confidence to pursue M&A transactions. Accordingly, it is comforting when a dispute over the meaning of familiar M&A agreement provisions is resolved by a court in a manner consistent with the common understanding of how these provisions should work.
Such was the case in a recent decision of the Delaware Court of Chancery in Winshall v. Viacom International Inc., Civil Action No. 6074-CS (Del. Ch. Dec. 12, 2012). By granting summary judgment to selling stockholders in a dispute with media giant Viacom International over its 2006 purchase of Harmonix Music Systems, the court refused to allow Viacom to proceed with claims that the language of its acquisition agreement did not support.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
A federal district court in Miami, FL, has ruled that former National Basketball Association star Shaquille O'Neal will have to face a lawsuit over his promotion of unregistered securities in the form of cryptocurrency tokens and that he was a "seller" of these unregistered securities.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.
This article reviews the fundamental underpinnings of the concept of insurable interest, and certain recent cases that have grappled with the scope of insurable interest and have articulated a more meaningful application of the concept to claims under first-party property policies.