Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Real estate practitioners are accustomed to seeing lease terms and conditions that are subject to a reasonableness standard. In fact, one of the most common revisions to real estate contracts and leases during negotiations is the repeated insertion of the word “reasonable” in front of the parties' rights and remedies. Yet we rarely examine the substantive effect of that word.
This article summarizes the results of a 50-state survey of case law addressing this issue. (Only 38 states and the District of Columbia have opined on this issue.) More specifically, these cases examine the authority for withholding of consent when a lease is silent as to the landlord's right to do so, as well as the criteria used to determine what constitutes a landlord's unreasonable withholding of consent. The courts' holdings on these issues vary significantly from state to state. While there are numerous contexts in which the reasonableness standard applies, this article focuses on cases regarding assignment and subleasing, and alterations to the leased premises, as these are the issues courts around the country have most commonly reviewed.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.