Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Partner Purges: Practical or Perilous?

By William C. Cobb
February 26, 2013

There's a new trend on the horizon: partner purges. Are they necessary? Is such a drastic move ultimately good for the law firm?

I generally agree that sometimes such a move is needed, but there are some tough issues involved. Partners of firms that have spun off from Big-Law firms have isolated part of the problem. Those founders of the spin-off firms say one of the reasons they left their large firms in the first place was because of the increasing focus on an “eat what you kill” culture, and the valuation of “book of business” over partnership and collaboration. Whole Foods CEO John Mackey recently made a great comment: “We all need for our red blood cells to keep producing, but if they stop reproducing, we die.” Law firms need to continue to create red blood cells within the firm or the firm dies. If “book of business” is the primary metric used by law firms to classify partners to purge, several problems may produce unintended consequences:

  • Internal competition for client credit increases along with lack of trust among lawyers.
  • Lawyers begin to hoard clients to the detriment of the client, who will not get the right expertise applied to the problem.
  • “Eat what you kill” partners tend not to delegate work to people who can perform the work more efficiently and with less costs to the client.
  • Laterals brought in because of their books become more focused on their own clients rather than trying to institutionalize the clients into the firm.
  • The firm may cut into the muscle of contributions that cannot be traced by the book of business, including training, mentorship, interview skills, expert systems creation, and glueing clients to the firm.

What, Exactly, Is 'Deadwood'?

This premium content is locked for LJN Newsletters subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

Compliance Officers: Recent Regulatory Guidance and Enforcement Actions and Mitigating the Risk of Personal Liability Image

This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.