Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Partner Purges: Practical or Perilous?

By William C. Cobb

There's a new trend on the horizon: partner purges. Are they necessary? Is such a drastic move ultimately good for the law firm?

I generally agree that sometimes such a move is needed, but there are some tough issues involved. Partners of firms that have spun off from Big-Law firms have isolated part of the problem. Those founders of the spin-off firms say one of the reasons they left their large firms in the first place was because of the increasing focus on an “eat what you kill” culture, and the valuation of “book of business” over partnership and collaboration. Whole Foods CEO John Mackey recently made a great comment: “We all need for our red blood cells to keep producing, but if they stop reproducing, we die.” Law firms need to continue to create red blood cells within the firm or the firm dies. If “book of business” is the primary metric used by law firms to classify partners to purge, several problems may produce unintended consequences:

  • Internal competition for client credit increases along with lack of trust among lawyers.
  • Lawyers begin to hoard clients to the detriment of the client, who will not get the right expertise applied to the problem.
  • “Eat what you kill” partners tend not to delegate work to people who can perform the work more efficiently and with less costs to the client.
  • Laterals brought in because of their books become more focused on their own clients rather than trying to institutionalize the clients into the firm.
  • The firm may cut into the muscle of contributions that cannot be traced by the book of business, including training, mentorship, interview skills, expert systems creation, and glueing clients to the firm.

What, Exactly, Is 'Deadwood'?

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Beach Boys Songs Written Decades Ago Triggered Current Quarrel With Lawyers Image

There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Transfer Tax Implications on Real Property Leases Image

The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.