Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Asset forfeiture has become a powerful weapon in the Department of Justice's (DOJ's) anti-fraud and financial crime arsenal, adding to the challenges faced by counsel representing individuals and companies in the cross-hairs of a government investigation. With the professed goal of taking the profit out of crime, the DOJ has aggressively prosecuted economic crimes and pursued higher-value forfeitures. See GAO Report to Congressional Requesters, Justice Assets Forfeiture Fund, Transparency of Balances and Controls over Equitable Sharing Should Be Improved (July 2012), available at www.gao.gov/assets/600/592349.pdf; DOJ, National Asset Forfeiture Strategic Plan 2008-2012 (2008), available at www.justice.gov/criminal/afmls/pubs/pdf/strategicplan.pdf.
U.S.'Attorneys' offices reportedly collected $13.1 billion nationwide in criminal and civil forfeiture actions during fiscal year 2012, more than doubling the $6.5 billion collected in fiscal year 2011. In fact, fiscal year 2012's forfeitures nearly matched the $13.18 billion collected in fiscal years 2010 and 2011 combined, half of which have been reported to involve white collar crime. Press Release, U.S. Attorney's Office Announces Record Collections in Civil & Criminal Actions in Fiscal Year 2012 (Dec. 11, 2012), available at www.justice.gov/usao/ncw/pressreleases/Charlotte-2012-12-11-financial-recoveries-2012.html; Alice W. Dery, Overview of Asset Forfeiture, ABA Business Law Today, 1 (June 2012), http://apps.americanbar.org/buslaw/blt/content/2012/06/article-02-dery.shtml.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.