Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
A court's decision to certify a class often constitutes the end of the litigation because of the increased settlement pressure faced by defendants. Apparently recognizing that trend, federal courts have applied increasingly rigorous standards of proof at the class certification stage. The Supreme Court has granted certiorari in Comcast Corp. v. Behrend on the following question: “Whether a district court may certify a class action without resolving whether the plaintiff class has introduced admissible evidence, including expert testimony, to show that the class is susceptible to awarding damages on a class-wide basis?”
There, the petitioners are arguing that the plaintiffs' expert's damages model does not have the requisite Daubert “fit” with the plaintiffs' theory of antitrust impact. Nevertheless, the case may answer whether a district court must engage in a full Daubert inquiry before utilizing an expert's testimony at the class certification stage under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23. Accordingly, the decision could have far-reaching implications for all class actions.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.
On Aug. 9, 2023, Gov. Kathy Hochul introduced New York's inaugural comprehensive cybersecurity strategy. In sum, the plan aims to update government networks, bolster county-level digital defenses, and regulate critical infrastructure.
Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights
“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.
'Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel is a continuation of the discussion of client expectations and the disconnect that often occurs. And although the outside attorneys should be pursuing how inside-counsel actually think, inside counsel should make an effort to impart this information without waiting to be asked.