Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Deciding between parents in a contested child custody dispute is one of the most daunting challenges a court can face. The relevant statute in New York, for example, directs simply that the court make its decision on the basis of “the best interests of the child.” (Domestic Relations Law ' 240.) The statute essentially stops at this level of abstraction. It provides no objective or operational definition of “best interests of the child,” meaning that it remains an elusive concept, an aspiration really, rather than an operational standard.
Underscoring the subjectivity and complexity of the concept, judicial proclamations have made clear that the “only absolute in the law governing custody of children is that there are no absolutes” Friederwitzer v. Friederwitzer, 55 N.Y.2d 89, 432 N.E.2d 765 (1982), and that the court must base its determination on the totality of the circumstances. As often stated by the Court of Appeals, the decisional law eschews absolutes in favor of elucidating “policies designed not to bind the courts but to guide them in determining what is in the best interests of the child.” Eschbach v. Eschbach, 56 N.Y.2d 167, 171, 451 N.Y.S.2d 658, 436 N.E.2d 1260 (1982). These decisions leave the litigation landscape immersed in a thick fog of subjectivity and the lawyers and judges who traverse it in constant search for points of clarity. As an example, a review of recent New York decisions offers slight elucidation.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
On Aug. 9, 2023, Gov. Kathy Hochul introduced New York's inaugural comprehensive cybersecurity strategy. In sum, the plan aims to update government networks, bolster county-level digital defenses, and regulate critical infrastructure.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.