Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In a series of recent decisions, the bankruptcy court for the Southern District of New York has broadly interpreted section 502(e)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code in disallowing substantial claims arising in the context of: 1) liability for environmental remediation; or 2) complex environmental tort litigation that often ensues in cases of longstanding environmental pollution or contamination. Thus, section 502(e)(1)(B) has proven an effective, although arguably controversial, mechanism in limiting the liability of debtors for claims for contribution or indemnity by co-liable parties both under the statutory mechanism of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. ” 9601 et seq. (CERCLA), and under state common law governing claims for contribution and indemnification.
Accordingly, the application and potential consequences of section 502(e)(1)(B) need to be evaluated by each of the parties to significant multi-party environmental litigation in which one of the defendants or potential defendants has filed for bankruptcy or a bankruptcy filing is a strategic consideration in limiting liability for exposure to the costs of remediation and/or litigation.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.