Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
FTC Finds Pay-for-Delay on the Rise
A Federal Trade Commission (FTC) report says that in fiscal year 2012, name-brand and would-be generic pharmaceuticals manufacturers entered into 40 potential “pay for delay” agreements, a sharp increase from previous years. These types of deals are currently under scrutiny by the U.S. Supreme Court, which has been asked to decide whether they promote unlawful monopolies in the field of drug sales. “Sadly, this year's report makes it clear that the problem of pay-for-delay is getting worse, not better,” said FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz in an FTC release. “More and more brand and generic drug companies are engaging in these sweetheart deals, and consumers continue to pay the price. Until this issue is resolved, we will all suffer the consequences of delayed generic entry ' higher prices for consumers, businesses, and the U.S. taxpayer.” U.S. regulators are not the only ones turning a jaundiced eye on the concept of pay for delay: For example, on Jan. 31, European Union regulators formally accused drug makers Johnson & Johnson and Novartis of colluding to keep generic versions of the drug fentanyl out of the Dutch market.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.