Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
A physician is arrested and charged with a felony, and immediately solicits the assistance of a criminal defense attorney. Upon conferring with the attorney, the physician agrees to accept a plea to a misdemeanor charge, because it will enable the physician to avoid any possibility of imprisonment. The physician then pleads guilty before the criminal court judge and allocutes to facts sufficient to meet the criteria for the misdemeanor charge. He exits the courtroom, relieved that the criminal matter seemingly is behind him.'
Months later, the physician is notified by his state's medical licensing agency that he is being brought up on charges of professional misconduct and that action against his medical license is being sought. The charge: conviction of a misdemeanor. Worse, under the state's statutory scheme, by virtue of the conviction, the issue of the physician's culpability for professional misconduct is not, and cannot be, the subject of dispute; rather, the only issue to be resolved is the severity of the sanctions to be meted out by the state licensing authority. Anxious over the existing threat to his medical license, the physician then learns of other potential hazards flowing from his guilty plea, including possible exclusion from the Medicare and Medicaid programs. The physician is baffled by this, because the alleged criminal acts did not involve patient care.'
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.