Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
A small but vocal faction of the matrimonial bar is sounding a call to arms against the progress that has been made in the past 15 years to ensure that children have a voice in the custody and visitation disputes that profoundly impact their lives. This is an issue of great concern at Lawyers For Children (LFC), where we see every day the constructive impact that the child's perspective has in these proceedings, and the extent to which experienced, well-trained attorneys for children can achieve better outcomes for children and their families in contested custody proceedings.
LFC's attorneys represent approximately 3,000 children in over 6,000 proceedings each year. Hundreds of those proceedings involve complex, high-conflict custody and visitation disputes. Over nearly 30 years, we have gained a clear understanding of the critical role the attorney for the child can play in presenting the child's position without the filter of the parent's needs or wishes.'
Evolution of the Role
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.