Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

The Intellectual Property StrategistKickerFeaturesTopicsLitigationSectionsNewsLJN Newsletters

The RAND Modified Hypothetical Negotiation

By Mark A. Chapman and Rose Cordero Prey
May 31, 2013

On April 25, 2013, Judge James L. Robart of the Western District of Washington publicly issued his Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law from the November 2012 bench trial in Microsoft Corp. v. Motorola, Inc., et al., Case No. 2:10-cv-01823-JLR (W.D. Wash.). Judge Robart's 207-page opinion describes in great detail the methodology he used and the evidence he considered to determine a reasonable and non-discriminatory (“RAND”) royalty for Microsoft's use of certain Motorola standard essential patents (“SEPs”) related to video compression and wireless networking. To determine the RAND royalty, Judge Robart applied the traditional Georgia-Pacific factors, but modified the hypothetical negotiation to assume that it was conducted under a RAND obligation. For both sets of SEPs, Judge Robart determined both a royalty rate as well as a range of royalty rates that would satisfy the RAND obligation. These determinations will serve as a baseline for the jury in the upcoming August trial over whether Motorola's license offers to Microsoft ' which were considerably higher than the court's RAND license rates ' were made in good faith and not a breach of Motorola's contractual obligation to license its SEPs under RAND terms.

Background

This premium content is locked for LJN Newsletters subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

A Lawyer's System for Active Reading Image

Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.