Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In a case of first impression, a split panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit restored a cause of action by a former college football player who says his likeness was appropriated without his consent for use in a video game. In so holding, the appeals court panel reversed a New Jersey federal district court that had dismissed the ex-player's suit on the ground that video games are afforded First Amendment protections as expressive speech. The Third Circuit agreed that video games enjoy First Amendment protections, but said intellectual property rights could impose limits on those free speech rights.
In Hart v. Electronic Arts Inc., 11-3750, the Third Circuit on a 2-1 vote said that Ryan Hart, who played quarterback for Rutgers University in 2004 and 2005, could bring a right of publicity claim against Electronic Arts over its NCAA Football video game. Hart filed the suit as a purported class action. He alleges that the video-game maker violated his right of publicity by featuring a player with his jersey number, 13; his height and weight; and his token left-hand wristband.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights
“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.
'Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel is a continuation of the discussion of client expectations and the disconnect that often occurs. And although the outside attorneys should be pursuing how inside-counsel actually think, inside counsel should make an effort to impart this information without waiting to be asked.