Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Mediation has become an important component in family law proceedings. Going to trial ' once you finally get there after waiting months, sometimes years, due to busy court dockets and unnecessarily prolonged litigation ' is expensive, takes quite an emotional toll on the parties and, at the end of the day, requires waiting for an uncertain result because no one can truly predict how the judge is going to rule. Accordingly, while court intervention in family law matters is sometimes inevitable, in the vast majority of cases it is in both parties' interests to resolve their divorce, post-dissolution issues, paternity action, or other family law matter in mediation. This article offers eight tips for making the most of mediation in a family law matter.
1. Scheduling the Mediation
The first step to ensuring a successful mediation begins before the mediation is even scheduled; it is important to consider factors that will help set the stage for a productive mediation. For instance, parties often have the choice to attend either: 1) a private mediation, in which they select and pay for a mediator, who is often a seasoned family law attorney, and will have the mediation at a time and place convenient for the parties; or 2) a courthouse mediation, which frequently also has a seasoned practitioner serving as mediator, such as a retired family law judge, and is held at the courthouse where the case is pending. The primary difference between a private and courthouse mediation are the costs ' a courthouse mediation is more often than not conducted at a significantly reduced cost (as compared with paying another family law attorney an hourly rate to serve as mediator); however, the tradeoff is time. In a private mediation, the parties can agree to start a mediation at 9 a.m. and go well into the night or continue the following morning, if necessary, to reach an agreement, as opposed to a courthouse mediation, which is often limited to only a few hours and has to be pre-scheduled with the court.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.