Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Despite amendments to statute and court rule, it unfortunately remains all too common for the court still improperly to see the renamed “Attorney for the Child” if not as an aid to the court, as a purported “impartial” and “independent” sounding board whom the court will hear first at any conference. (The title “Attorney for the Child” was officially changed from the term “Law Guardian” in accordance with the Laws of New York, 2010, Chapter 41 amending the Domestic Relations Law, Civil Practice Laws and Rules, Family Court Act, Public Health Law, and Social Services Law, as well as the Rules of the Chief Judge at 22 NYCRR ' 7.2.)
In this regard, the child's attorney often gives the court his view of the case, at least as it relates to his client, and sometimes includes his “opinion” on the parents, the parents' interactions, and their purported parenting skills. It then becomes a defensive battle for the parent's attorney to start trying to refute an opinion (sometimes skewed) that may very well be taken, if not as gospel, at least as a reliable starting point for discussion.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.