Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Declaratory Bids Denied in Dispute over Literary Agent Agreement
The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, denied both literary agent Ken Levin's motion for summary judgment, and that of The Yard author Alex Grecian, in their opposing declaratory claims over whether a literary agent agreement that Grecian signed with Levin remained valid. Levin v. Grecian, 12 C 767. The initial seven-year term of the agreement expired in November 2011. Shortly after, Grecian informed Levin that he was terminating the agreement (though it automatically renewed unless Grecian sent Levin a 60-day notice of termination, which he hadn't). Levin didn't sell any of Grecian's novels until 2011, by pairing with literary agent Seth Fishman and securing a $500,000 deal from Putnam Publishing. Grecian claimed Levin materially breached his agreement with the author by not using “best efforts” to previously sell any Grecian novels. Though the Levin/Grecian agreement didn't specifically state the agent must use his “best efforts,” District Judge Gary Feinerman read that into the relationship because the agreement had made Levin the “sole and exclusive representative” of Grecian. Judge Feinerman went on to determine that “a reasonable factfinder could find the admitted quality of Grecian's work and the speed with which The Yard was sold once Fishman was brought onboard, combined with Levin's failure to sell any of Grecian's work before then, to be persuasive evidence that Levin did not exercise his best efforts.” Levin further argued that Grecian waived any breach. But Judge Feinerman noted: “In particular, the fact that [in 2008] Grecian asked to be released from the Agreement but did not sue for rescission when Levin refused suggests that Grecian was thinking in terms of an ideal and mutually beneficial business relationship between Levin and Grecian and not in terms of their respective legal obligations. If Grecian did not know [then] that Levin's inaction was potentially a material breach, then he could not have knowingly waived his right to assert that breach.”
Method for Monetizing Internet Content Not Too Abstract for Patentability
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.