Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
A dismissed lawsuit over the rights to the Ghost Rider comic book character has been revived and sent back for trial. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit decided that Gary Friedrich, who claimed he created the flaming-skull motorcycle superhero, will get a chance to challenge Marvel Comics' claim that the character was the result of a collaborative process within Marvel. Gary Friedrich Enterprises LLC v. Marvel Characters Inc., 12-893.
The Second Circuit reversed the decision of Southern District Judge Katherine Forrest, who had granted summary judgment for Marvel and other defendants on Marvel's claim that it owned the renewal rights on the Ghost Rider character, which made its debut in 1972. District Judge Forrest found that Friedrich had assigned any rights to Ghost Rider when he executed a work-for-hire agreement in 1978, six years after the comic book first appeared. She dismissed Friedrich's claim and awarded $17,000 in damages to Marvel on its counterclaim for copyright infringement.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.