Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Compensation for attorneys specializing in navigating failed enterprises through the bankruptcy maze has skyrocketed in recent years. Not only have rates of some premier bankruptcy attorneys soared to over $1,000 per hour, but large cases often produce fees in amounts that resemble long distance telephone numbers.
In response to perceived excesses in the bankruptcy compensation process, the United States Trustee Program recently introduced new fee application guidelines for qualifying engagements. The new guidelines seek to: 1) subject bankruptcy attorneys to the same client-driven market forces and scrutiny facing non-bankruptcy attorneys; 2) increase disclosure, transparency and public confidence in bankruptcy compensation process; and 3) remove “premium rates” from bankruptcy-associated fees. Whether the new guidelines will achieve these goals remains to be seen. But, what is abundantly clear is that, as the fee application process continues to evolve, bankruptcy practitioners must remain nimble and adapt accordingly.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.