Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Medical Malpractice Law & StrategyKickerFeaturesTopicsLitigationSectionsNewsLJN Newsletters

Suits Against Generic Pharm Manufacturers

By Janice G. Inman
July 29, 2013

Among the landmark decisions issued by the U.S. Supreme Court in the final weeks of its last session, one that affects the nation's consumers of generic drugs got less attention than it might have deserved. In Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. Inc. v. Bartlett, 2013 U.S. LEXIS 4702 (U.S. 6/24/13), the court overturned the award of millions of dollars in damages to a woman injured by the use of a generic version of a patented, FDA-approved drug, after finding that the manufacturer could not be held responsible through a state-law claim for defective design, because it was actually a failure-to-warn claim in disguise.

Failure-to-warn claims against generic drug manufacturers, which by federal law are required to use the same warning labels used by manufacturers of their products' brand-name equivalents, have been precluded by the Supreme Court's 2011 decision in PLIVA Inc. v. Mensing, 131 S. Ct. 2567 (2011).

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Law Firms are Reducing Redundant Real Estate by Bringing Support Services Back to the Office Image

A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.

Bit Parts Image

Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights

Risks of “Baseball Arbitration” in Resolving Real Estate Disputes Image

“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.

Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel Image

'Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel is a continuation of the discussion of client expectations and the disconnect that often occurs. And although the outside attorneys should be pursuing how inside-counsel actually think, inside counsel should make an effort to impart this information without waiting to be asked.

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.