Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The issue of religion sometimes plays a role in custody determinations. While differences in religious beliefs may be either inconsequential or highly significant during a marriage, once parents part ways, concerns over the religious upbringing of their children can become as relevant as decisions about education, health, and financial responsibility for their children's lives. Courts typically address issues of religion on a case-by-case basis, engaging in fact-specific analysis to determine custody decisions. Because of the uncertainty inherent in this analysis, parents may be better off trying to reach a resolution outside the court system regarding the religious upbringing of their children.
The clear goal in all custody cases is to protect the child. The sanctity of the family is to be embraced to the extent that it is in the best interests of the child to keep the State from interfering with a family's religious practices. The intention is to keep the State from unduly getting involved in the day-to-day lives of a family unless each parent's approach is very divergent. When the religious practices become highly unusual, a court can examine whether they are unduly burdensome on the child, particularly if these religious practices are new and have arisen after the divorce action.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.