Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In January of this year, the American Psychological Association (APA) published a revised and updated set of guidelines for the practice of forensic psychology (APA, (2013). Specialty Guidelines for Forensic Psychology, American Psychologist, 68(1), 7-19.). This document represents a substantial and long-awaited improvement over the prior set of guidelines, especially with respect to its breadth and clarity.
Because some of the new guidelines have particular relevance to child custody assessment, family law practitioners should make themselves aware of them. But first, two things should be noted: For one, the guidelines are not mandatory “rules,” but aspirational guidelines meant to inform and elevate practice. As such, with the exception of those sections closely tied to the APA ethical principles, an individual practitioner can choose to deviate from their content. Second, the guidelines are addressed to the entire spectrum of professional activities that can be defined as “forensic,” including custody assessments, criminal and tort-related evaluations, research activity, consultation, and mediation, among others.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.