Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Firing Abusive Disabled-Patient Caregivers: Expos' Finds No Improvement
In 2011, The New York Times published an article exposing a troubling statistic: Less than a quarter of State workers employed by one agency to care for people with developmental disabilities were fired after they were found to have abused a charge or exhibited other egregious misconduct, even though their supervisors recommended discharge. Most remained in the employ of the State Office for People With Developmental Disabilities largely because of strong employee unions and the requirement that potential discharge cases be submitted to arbitration. On Aug. 9, the Times published results of a follow-up inquiry of the same agency, as well as of the State Office of Mental Health. Using employee disciplinary records obtained through the Freedom of Information Act, the Times once again found that just 23% of the 227 employees found guilty of patient abuse at the State Office for People With Developmental Disabilities were actually discharged from their positions; at the State Office of Mental Health, that number was 27%. Hakim, “State Lagging on Dismissals in Abuse Cases,” The New York Times, 8/9/13.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.