Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
M&A transactions involving publicly traded companies with controlling stockholders often present thorny issues for dealmakers and their legal counsel. Even in the case of a purchase by an unaffiliated third party, controlling stockholders understandably may seek to leverage their control positions to achieve results that best suit them. Further, private equity buyers in particular often require controlling stockholders to “roll over” a portion of their stock into equity of the continuing corporation and/or enter into other arrangements to facilitate the transaction.
As a result, litigation challenging the fairness of these transactions to the public stockholders is a staple of M&A practice. In an effort to assure a degree of fairness to the public stockholders, the Delaware courts traditionally have imposed more intrusive standards of review than are customarily employed in buyouts of companies without controlling stockholders.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.