Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Ninth Circuit federal appeals court Chief Judge Alex Kozinski recently questioned whether federal courts should hear motions to strike under California's “ant-SLAPP” statute. California Civil Code '425.16 is aimed at protecting parties against lawsuits filed to suppress involvement in free speech activities. In Makaeff v. Trump University LLC, 715 F.3d 254 (9th Cir. 2013), which allowed an anti-SLAPP motion to proceed, Judge Kozinski nevertheless wrote in a concurrence that the state statute “cuts an ugly gash through” the “integrated program of pre-trial, trial and post-trial procedures” set out in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
The anti-SLAPP law may be used to strike state, but not federal, law claims. However, it is frequently used in California state and federal courts, both of which continue to interpret how the statute's provisions should be applied.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.