Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Audio recordings of speech, musical instruments or any other sounds created before Feb. 15, 1972, are treated very differently from other recorded sounds under U.S. law. Each of the 50 states is free to apply its own rules to the protection of audio sound recordings made before Feb. 15, 1972, and may continue to do so for the next 54 years. As a consequence, the scope of protection for pre-1972 sound recordings is inconsistent from state to state, often vague and sometimes difficult to discern. In contrast, sound recordings made on and after Feb. 15, 1972, are governed by the U.S. Copyright Act, which imposes uniform treatment nationwide. The discrepancy is explained by the fact that Congress never saw fit to bring domestic pre-1972 sound recordings within the scope of federal copyright protection. (Certain pre-1972 sound recordings of foreign origin were given U.S. federal copyright protection beginning in 1996 under the 1994 Uruguay Round Agreements Act in order to comply with U.S. treaty obligations.) As a result, online radio stations, documentary film makers, archivists and others who copy, publicly perform, excerpt or adapt such sound recordings are exposed to uncertainty and confusion.
Sound Recordings'Copyright History
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.