Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Windsor, 133 S. Ct. 2675 (2013), has had immediate, positive effects on the aspirations of same-sex couples to be accorded the same rights long held by heterosexual spouses. In Windsor, the Court struck down as unconstitutional the definition of marriage ' as the union of one man and one woman ' contained in the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) (codified at 1 U.S.C. ' 7). The Court ruled that DOMA, by its restrictive definition of marriage, sought to ' and did ' injure same-sex spouses, legally married under state law, by denying them the array of federal benefits enjoyed by heterosexual married couples.
As Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote in his majority opinion, “DOMA writes inequality into the entire United States Code ' forc[ing] same-sex couples to live as married for the purpose of state law but unmarried for the purpose of federal law ' .” Windsor, 133 S. Ct. at 2694. Justice Kennedy noted that DOMA prevented same-sex married couples from obtaining benefits they would otherwise be entitled to under more than 1,000 federal statutes and regulations. See id. at 2690, 2694.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.