Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Copyright Infringement Claim Is Time-Barred If Ownership Claim Is, Too
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit decided that a claim for copyright infringement is barred if a copyright ownership claim in the litigation is, too. Seven Arts Filmed Entertainment Ltd. v. Content Media Corp., 11-56759. The case involved copyright claims by Seven Arts against Paramount Pictures over several films. The ruling, which was a case of first impression in the Ninth Circuit, places that circuit in line with the Second and Sixth Circuits on the issue. According to the Ninth Circuit's decision, “We join our sister circuits in holding that an untimely ownership claim will bar a claim for copyright infringement where the gravamen of the dispute is ownership, at least where, as here, the parties are in a close relationship. [Seven Arts's predecessor-in-interest CineVisions had executed a 'first look' agreement with Paramount in 1998.] Because it is apparent from the complaint that Paramount clearly and expressly repudiated Seven Arts's ownership of the copyrights more than three years before Seven Arts brought suit, the district court properly dismissed.”
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.