Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Everyone, especially corporate leaders, got a little paranoid last year when National Security Agency (NSA) whistleblower Edward Snowden pulled the alarm on U.S. surveillance. See, “NSA Revelations Boost Corporate Paranoia About State Surveillance,” Financial Times, (registration req'd.). That paranoia turned into palpable risk after reports emerged of the NSA tapping the phones of German Chancellor Angela Merkel and executives at Brazilian oil company. See, “United States Tracked Merkel's Phone Since 2002: Report.”'
Now, European countries have committed to overhauling their archaic data protection standards to mitigate the risks of economic espionage, and plan to include provisions to protect consumer information.
The European Parliament's civil liberties committee voted to upgrade current standards to ensure laws are “up to the challenges of the digital age,” according to Bryan Glick for Computer Weekly. See, “MEPs Vote to Tighten Data Protection Rules After Internet Surveillance Revelations.”'
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.