Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Hulk Hogan Denied Temporary Injunction Against Publication of Sex Tape
The Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District, affirmed the denial of Hulk Hogan's bid for a temporary injunction to stop publication of a sex tape that he says was created without his consent. Gawker Media LLC v. Bollea, 2D13-1951. Gawker Media published a report and video excerpts of the sex tape, of an extramarital affair of Hogan's, on its website. But Gawker denies being responsible for creation of the video. The court of appeal noted: “Here, the written report and video excerpts are linked to a matter of public concern ' Mr. Bollea's [i.e., Hulk Hogan's] extramarital affair and the video evidence of such ' as there was ongoing public discussion about the affair and the Sex Tape, including by Mr. Bollea himself. Therefore, Mr. Bollea failed to meet the heavy burden to overcome the presumption that the temporary injunction is invalid as an unconstitutional prior restraint under the First Amendment.”
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.