Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
During the Monica Lewinsky scandal of the late 1990s, it became fashionable for commentators to decry the relative lack of perjury prosecutions arising out of civil matters. These critics were generally spot on: Criminal prosecutors, busy with their own caseloads, rarely have an appetite to plunge into complicated civil lawsuits in search of those who obstruct the civil justice system.
Much more common, of course, are prosecutions for: 1) false statements to federal investigators, under 18 U.S.C. ' 1001; and 2) lies under oath during grand jury proceedings, 18 U.S.C. ' 1623 or, less frequently, criminal trials. 18 U.S.C. ' 1621. The simplest reason is that the prosecutor ' the only actor in the justice system with the authority to charge defendants with perjury ' is present at the time of the crime. If the lie is serious enough, the prosecutor has the authority to vindicate the sanctity of the oath or the integrity of the investigation.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.