Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
As law enforcement authorities have ramped up their investigations of businesses and financial institutions in recent years, companies engaged in civil litigation increasingly find themselves targets of related criminal investigations. Navigating through the competing demands of civil discovery and mounting a criminal defense poses unique challenges and potential landmines for corporate counsel. Among other considerations, confidential materials that would have otherwise been outside of the government's reach, in certain instances, may become subject to subpoena if they are produced in the course of civil discovery.
Almost three years after the Supreme Court declined to resolve the issue, tensions persist among federal courts over whether a civil protective order can in fact safeguard confidential corporate materials from compelled disclosure in a subsequent criminal proceeding. Faced with disparate standards, how litigants choose to conduct civil discovery is more vital than ever to safeguarding confidential materials and protecting a company's ability to defend against a criminal or regulatory investigation. Even before any investigation surfaces, corporate counsel must be cognizant of the risks involved, and pursue a litigation strategy that preserves the company's rights and defenses.
The Roots of the Conflict
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?