Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Counsel Fees: A Tipping Point
The recent decision in Sykes v. Sykes, 41 Misc.3d 1061 (Sup. Ct. N.Y. Cty. 2013), sent shock waves reverberating throughout the New York matrimonial bar for its direction that during the pendency of a divorce litigation, the less monied spouse may be required to use a portion of her share of the marital estate to pay her legal fees, rather than continue to have such fees paid by the wealthier spouse. The court's rationale in Sykes , as more fully detailed herein, was that because the wife was receiving significant pendente lite maintenance and child support, unless she was responsible for her own counsel fees, she had no incentive to resolve or move the case forward due to her lack of “skin in the game.”
As a result of the decision in Sykes , matrimonial practitioners are left contemplating when a court might apply this principal of “skin in the game.” This article addresses when and why a case may reach the tipping point that pushes it over the equal playing field presumption inherent in Domestic Relations Law (DRL) ' 237 to the “skin in the game” analysis, as described in Sykes . As will be explained, this different approach appears to depend largely on several factors, including the length of the action, the animosity between the parties, the parties' separate property assets, the legal fees the monied spouse has already paid, and the marital assets at issue.
Background
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.