Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Litigating Trade Secret Claims

By Paul Cowie and Dorna Moini
June 02, 2014

In February 2014, a quantitative analyst at a New York hedge fund was arrested for using a decompiler program to view his employer's encrypted trading models and then sending them to his personal e-mail. He allegedly planned to take this information to a new employer, apparently for significant financial incentives. The incident is reminiscent of another widely publicized theft at Goldman Sachs. In 2009, a week before quitting his job to join another trading firm, Sergey Aleynikov, a programmer at Goldman Sachs, downloaded 32 megabytes of a proprietary algorithmic trading code from his employer. The code, which some called Goldman's “secret sauce,” was used for a high-frequency trading (HFT) system, whereby traders use computer algorithms to rapidly trade securities, taking advantage of minute price changes to make a profit. Aleynikov had been offered $1.2 million per year to join a startup seeking to develop its own HFT system. He took that offer and was arrested by FBI agents at Newark Airport before making the jump.

Although high-profile, these are not isolated incidents. Former employees escape with valuable information every day, resulting in substantial, sometimes devastating losses to employers. Some employees claim the trade secrets belong to them; others attempt to explain away their conduct. Devices such as the new untraceable Blackphone, developed by Spanish startup Geeksphone, adds another layer of complication as it encrypts e-mails and text messaging, and has anti-tracking services that will make it much more difficult to discover employee misconduct and gain access to data during litigation.

This premium content is locked for Employment Law Strategist subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

Compliance Officers: Recent Regulatory Guidance and Enforcement Actions and Mitigating the Risk of Personal Liability Image

This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.