Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Management Company Gets Preliminary Injunction to Block Use of Artist Name It Created
The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas granted a personal manager's bid for a preliminary injunction to block a teen singer the manager previously represented from using the stage name “Sharv'.” Anderson v. Baker, 4:14-CV-1211. Shannon and Harvey Baker, the parents of 15-year-old Kaylah Baker, signed an agreement in May 2013 for Visionworld Entertainment, based in Broward County, FL, to be their daughter's exclusive manager. Visionworld hired a stylist to help develop a signature wholesome image for Kaylah, who the management company then promoted as “Sharv'.” But in March 2014, Shannon Baker sent the management company a contract termination notice after a dispute arose between the Bakers and Visionworld over how to use the artist's social media accounts. When the Bakers continued to promote Sharv' on their own, Visionworld filed a trademark suit against them. District Judge Melinda Harmon first noted: “Much of what has transpired could have been prevented or resolved through clear contractual language. ' Here, the Agreement did not contemplate this highly foreseeable dispute and was completely silent as to the ownership of any intellectual property rights which might be created during the course of the parties' relationship.” Determining that Visionworld came up with the “Sharv'” name and was first to use it in commerce, Judge Harmon went on decide “that Plaintiffs have shown that Defendants fully intend to capitalize on the goodwill and reputation generated by Visionworld by using the Sharv' mark to promote Kaylah Baker, now under their management, to young, impressionable, and unsavvy consumers. As such, the Court concludes that Plaintiffs have met their burden to show infringement of their mark by demonstrating that a likelihood of confusion exists with regard to the image of Sharv' created by Visionworld and the [more risqu'] image of Sharv' now being promoted by Plaintiffs.”
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.