Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Management Company Gets Preliminary Injunction to Block Use of Artist Name It Created
The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas granted a personal manager's bid for a preliminary injunction to block a teen singer the manager previously represented from using the stage name “Sharv'.” Anderson v. Baker, 4:14-CV-1211. Shannon and Harvey Baker, the parents of 15-year-old Kaylah Baker, signed an agreement in May 2013 for Visionworld Entertainment, based in Broward County, FL, to be their daughter's exclusive manager. Visionworld hired a stylist to help develop a signature wholesome image for Kaylah, who the management company then promoted as “Sharv'.” But in March 2014, Shannon Baker sent the management company a contract termination notice after a dispute arose between the Bakers and Visionworld over how to use the artist's social media accounts. When the Bakers continued to promote Sharv' on their own, Visionworld filed a trademark suit against them. District Judge Melinda Harmon first noted: “Much of what has transpired could have been prevented or resolved through clear contractual language. ' Here, the Agreement did not contemplate this highly foreseeable dispute and was completely silent as to the ownership of any intellectual property rights which might be created during the course of the parties' relationship.” Determining that Visionworld came up with the “Sharv'” name and was first to use it in commerce, Judge Harmon went on decide “that Plaintiffs have shown that Defendants fully intend to capitalize on the goodwill and reputation generated by Visionworld by using the Sharv' mark to promote Kaylah Baker, now under their management, to young, impressionable, and unsavvy consumers. As such, the Court concludes that Plaintiffs have met their burden to show infringement of their mark by demonstrating that a likelihood of confusion exists with regard to the image of Sharv' created by Visionworld and the [more risqu'] image of Sharv' now being promoted by Plaintiffs.”
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.