Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently issued a draft guidance document to make “recommendations” and to clarify its position regarding the dissemination of scientific information that discusses unapproved (i.e., off-label) uses of approved products. (The draft guidance document, “Guidance for Industry: Distributing Scientific and Medical Publications on Unapproved New Uses ' Recommended Practices,” can be accessed at: http://1.usa.gov/1nHQNGu.)
This guidance follows the FDA's guidance, entitled “Good Reprint Practices for the Distribution of Medical Journal Articles and Medical or Scientific Reference Publications on Unapproved New Uses of Approved Drugs and Approved or Cleared Medical Devices.” The FDA issued the most recent guidance, in part, in response to some industry concerns that the earlier guidance was too limiting on companies' ability to distribute off-label information that might benefit the public.
While the FDA may permit dissemination of off-label information in certain cases, life science companies must be aware that such an allowance does not exempt or protect against potential liability exposure. This article summarizes the FDA's two guidance documents and cautions that, despite the agency's acceptance of off-label dissemination practices, companies should consider the potential liability exposure when distributing information about unapproved uses of their products.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?