Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The U.S. Supreme Court recently issued its long-awaited decision in Halliburton v. Erica P. John Fund, Inc., and the result was very much in line with the forecasts of those who predicted a kind of split decision: The Court provided securities fraud defendants with a significant weapon to use in opposing class certification, but declined to jettison the fraud-on-the-market theory that has served as the basis for securities class actions for the past 25 years.
Despite the urging of Halliburton and its supporters, the Court did not overturn Basic Inc. v. Levinson, 485 U.S. 224 (1988), which conferred on plaintiffs the benefit of a presumption that all purchasers of stock trading in an efficient market relied on any alleged misrepresentation, because public securities markets are presumed to digest and thus reflect all publicly available, material information.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
A common question that commercial landlords and tenants face is which of them is responsible for a repair to the subject premises. These disputes often center on whether the repair is "structural" or "nonstructural."