Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Effective September 2012, the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA) established new ways to challenge the validity of a patent before the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO). Pub. L. No. 112-29, 125 Stat. 284 (2011). These proceedings include inter partes review (IPR), post-grant review (PGR), and the transitional program for covered business method patents (CBM Review). Such proceedings begin with a petition for review, to which a patent-holder can respond before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) makes an initial decision whether to institute review.
The AIA provides that the PTAB's initial decision on whether to institute proceedings “shall be final and nonappealable.” 35 U.S.C. '314(d) (IPR); '324(e) (PGR and CBM Review). But the precise meaning of this provision has already been disputed. Recent decisions have begun to shed light on the scope of review federal courts have on a PTAB initial determination.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.