Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Many individuals desire to acquire insurance on their lives using funds held in a qualified retirement plan. The acquisition of insurance using funds within an IRA (Plan) is beneficial since the Plan uses tax deductible dollars (the Plan Funds) to acquire the insurance. Furthermore, the Plan Funds are not otherwise being directly used by qualified plan participant (Participant) for the Participant.
In general, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has prevented IRAs to be used for the acquisition of life insurance. Specifically, an improperly designed estate plan using Plan Funds to acquire life insurance will result in the individual's estate realizing estate taxes on the insurance proceeds and excise tax on the IRA for the purchase of life insurance. Also, a Participant must incur income taxes on the value of the death benefit acquired by a plan on behalf of the Participant. The Internal Revenue Code (Code) restricts the amount of life insurance that may be acquire to preserve the intended purpose of the Plan, i.e., to provide retirement benefits to the Plan participant and his or her dependents. The Code also prevents individual retirement accounts from owning
life insurance. Furthermore, when a Plan owns life insurance on a Participant at the time of the Participant's death and the Participant possesses an incident of ownership over the policy within three years of death, the life insurance proceeds will be subject to estate tax. These 'incidents of ownership,' which are important in an analysis of the topic discussed herein, include having the power to: designate the beneficiary of the policy; surrender or cancel the policy; assign the policy; or borrow against the policy. These are just some of the impediments imposed by the Code to prevent or discourage a Plan from using Plan Funds to acquire life insurance policies on the life of a Participant.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.