Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Many individuals desire to acquire insurance on their lives using funds held in a qualified retirement plan. The acquisition of insurance using funds within an IRA (Plan) is beneficial since the Plan uses tax deductible dollars (the Plan Funds) to acquire the insurance. Furthermore, the Plan Funds are not otherwise being directly used by qualified plan participant (Participant) for the Participant.
In general, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has prevented IRAs to be used for the acquisition of life insurance. Specifically, an improperly designed estate plan using Plan Funds to acquire life insurance will result in the individual's estate realizing estate taxes on the insurance proceeds and excise tax on the IRA for the purchase of life insurance. Also, a Participant must incur income taxes on the value of the death benefit acquired by a plan on behalf of the Participant. The Internal Revenue Code (Code) restricts the amount of life insurance that may be acquire to preserve the intended purpose of the Plan, i.e., to provide retirement benefits to the Plan participant and his or her dependents. The Code also prevents individual retirement accounts from owning
life insurance. Furthermore, when a Plan owns life insurance on a Participant at the time of the Participant's death and the Participant possesses an incident of ownership over the policy within three years of death, the life insurance proceeds will be subject to estate tax. These 'incidents of ownership,' which are important in an analysis of the topic discussed herein, include having the power to: designate the beneficiary of the policy; surrender or cancel the policy; assign the policy; or borrow against the policy. These are just some of the impediments imposed by the Code to prevent or discourage a Plan from using Plan Funds to acquire life insurance policies on the life of a Participant.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.