Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Over the past few years, much ink has been spilled by judges, commentators, and e-discovery service providers opining on the merits and drawbacks of predictive coding. (As we noted in our article, “'Seed Set' Documents Should Not Be Discoverable,” 251 NYLJ 2 (Feb. 4, 2014), in which we provide background on predictive coding and review a number of judicial decisions on the topic, predictive coding, also often referred to as technology assisted review, is the use of computer-generated algorithms to supplement and extend the work of human reviewers in the discovery document review process.) Topics have included when predictive coding should and should not be used, which of the many competing predictive coding technologies and processes are best, whether predictive coding is more accurate than human review, and exactly how, if at all, predictive coding should be incorporated into discovery protocols.
In one of the best-known court battles over predictive coding, Moore v. Publicis Groupe, 287 F.R.D. 182 (S.D.N.Y. 2012), the court concluded that a judge could incorporate predictive coding into electronically stored information (ESI) protocols over the objection of one of the parties. But what happens when the parties have already agreed to an ESI protocol, which does not include predictive coding, and one party wants to change this protocol, over the objection of the other party, by incorporating predictive coding? Can one party unilaterally alter the method of discovery, or does the agreed-upon ESI protocol take precedence?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
A federal district court in Miami, FL, has ruled that former National Basketball Association star Shaquille O'Neal will have to face a lawsuit over his promotion of unregistered securities in the form of cryptocurrency tokens and that he was a "seller" of these unregistered securities.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.
This article reviews the fundamental underpinnings of the concept of insurable interest, and certain recent cases that have grappled with the scope of insurable interest and have articulated a more meaningful application of the concept to claims under first-party property policies.