Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Trust Planning
Editor's Note: As discussed last month, modern trusts are, in general, more protective than trusts created even in the recent past. Whether a trust's funds may be reachable in a divorce proceeding will depend on several factors, such as whether it is a “support” trust or a “discretionary” trust, or whether the trustee has the power to change or add beneficiaries. Now, the author explains how an existing trust may be made more “divorce-proof,” offers some hypothetical examples of the treatment trust funds may be given in divorce, and describes some lesser-known trust-related problems to be avoided.
Improving Old Irrevocable Trusts: Decanting
Many existing trusts were designed in less than optimally protective manners. What can be done? While the presumption has historically been that if a trust is irrevocable, it cannot be changed, decanting can improve even old trusts that do not incorporate the flexibility of modern trust drafting discussed in last month's issue. Decanting is the process of merging, or pouring over, an old trust into a new and improved trust. This technique has grown significantly in popularity and use in recent years, and may provide a vital method for practitioners to guide clients to improve trusts before a matrimonial challenge. This might raise the issue of pre-divorce planning, an issue with which practitioners are familiar. Therefore, the brief discussion below will focus only on the decanting. Trust decanting may provide an efficient mechanism to salvage the trust purpose. Decanting can be accomplished in one of three ways:
- Pursuant to the terms of the trust, if the governing instrument permits a transfer of trust assets to the new trust.
- Under state statute. A growing number of states permit decanting pursuant to state statute. Alaska has a very robust statute and if the old trust is not presently located in Alaska, it may be feasible to move the situs of the old trust to that state and then take advantage of the Alaska decanting statute.
- Under state common law. For example, New Jersey common law has provided a basis to merge an old trust into a new trust.
Decanting may enable a trustee to:
- Extend the term of an existing trust, although generation-skipping transfer tax issues must be addressed. If a client is a beneficiary of a trust that is set to distribute all principal at age 40, and the client is 37, decanting the trust into one that is perpetual may insulate trust assets from a future claim that may have had a greater chance of success if the assets were owned directly.
- Change trustee provisions to incorporate some of the more modern clauses discussed above.
- Change governing law and situs to a state that is more favorable to achieving trust objectives, such as Nevada, which does not provide for exception creditors.
Types of Trust and Trust Transactions
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
The Stranger to the Deed Rule
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.