Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The U.S. Supreme Court recently granted certiorari in a religious accommodation case, EEOC v. Abercrombie. This case involves a Muslim teenager, Samantha Elauf, who was denied a job at an Abercrombie & Fitch store because she wore a black headscarf, or hijab, to her job interview. Abercrombie argued not only that the company should not be required to hire and accommodate Elauf, but additionally that they were never given actual notice that she was wearing the hijab for religious reasons.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit granted summary judgment to Abercrombie, holding that the company did not have an obligation to accommodate Elauf since “Ms. Elauf never informed Abercrombie prior to its hiring decision that her practice of wearing a hijab was based on her religious beliefs.” EEOC v. Abercrombie & Fitch, 731 F.3d 1106, 1116 (10th Cir. 2013). In other words, the court held that an employee in a religious accommodation case has an obligation to give direct explicit notice to her employer that her religious practices conflict with a neutral work rule.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
A common question that commercial landlords and tenants face is which of them is responsible for a repair to the subject premises. These disputes often center on whether the repair is "structural" or "nonstructural."