The doctrines of res judicata (aka “claim preclusion”) and collateral estoppel (aka “issue preclusion”) are closely related: They both aim to foreclose a party from re-litigating a right, question or fact previously adjudicated by a court or tribunal of competent jurisdiction between the same or related parties.
<i>Res Judicata</i> and Collateral Estoppel In Subsequent Arbitration Proceedings
It is not uncommon in the realm of reinsurance disputes ' where the reinsurance contracts at issue very often require an arbitral forum ' for a party that has been victorious on an issue or claim in an initial arbitration (or lawsuit) to attempt to preclude its opponent or a related party from re-adjudicating that same claim or issue in a subsequent arbitration.
By
Benjamin L. Hincks And Kelly R. GrafThis premium content is locked for LawJournalNewsletters subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN LawJournalNewsletters
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already have an account? Sign In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or call 1-877-256-2473.
