Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Average Lateness Methodology

By Edward E. Neiger and Marianna Udem
February 28, 2015

Two recent decisions from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, Quebecor World Litigation Trust v. Clarklift-West, Inc. dba Clarklift Team Power (In re Quebecor World (USA), Inc.), 2014 WL 5292981 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Oct. 14, 2014) and Pereira v. United Parcel Service of America, Inc. (In re Waterford Wedgwood USA, Inc.), 508 B.R. 821 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2014) affirmed the use of “average lateness” methodology to examine both the subjective and the objective components of the ordinary course of business defense to preference actions. This has significance in that average lateness methodology may now be employed to assess both independent prongs of the ordinary course of business defense.

Quebecor World Litigation Trust

Read These Next
New York's Latest Cybersecurity Commitment Image

On Aug. 9, 2023, Gov. Kathy Hochul introduced New York's inaugural comprehensive cybersecurity strategy. In sum, the plan aims to update government networks, bolster county-level digital defenses, and regulate critical infrastructure.

Law Firms are Reducing Redundant Real Estate by Bringing Support Services Back to the Office Image

A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.

Bit Parts Image

Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights

The Bankruptcy Hotline Image

Recent cases of importance to your practice.

Risks of “Baseball Arbitration” in Resolving Real Estate Disputes Image

“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.