Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Bit Parts

By Stan Soocher
February 28, 2015

Blondie's Ex-Manager Denied Summary Judgment in His Bid for Percentage of Band's Deal from Selling Copyright Recapture Rights

Copyright termination rights have been a hot button issue in the music industry in the past several years, with 2013 being the first year under 17 U.S.C. '203 that authors could recapture copyrights for assignments they made for works created after 1977. A dispute between the rock band Blondie and the group's former manager Peter Leeds has raised the issue of a manager's commission rights when artists terminate those copyright assignments. Leeds managed Blondie when the band began having big hits in the latter half of the 1970s with Chrysalis Music. But Leeds and Blondie parted ways under a May 1979 written agreement. The agreement gave Leeds post-term commissions from “gross earnings” on Blondie's existing agreements in effect before Feb. 9, 1985, and to music created by the group members by that date. BMG Rights Management (BMG) later became the successor-in-interest to Blondie's music publishing agreements with Chrysalis. In December 2012, instead of exercising its copyright recapture rights, the band sold those rights to BMG for $1.3 million, which Leeds then claimed he had a right to commission. Blondie argued the statutory recapture rights didn't fall within the band's 1979 separation agreement with Leeds. In deciding Leeds' motion for summary judgment, Justice Anil C. Singh of the New York Supreme Court, New York County, first noted in part: “Leeds' interpretation that the payment for recapture rights falls within the broad definition of gross earnings is reasonable. The examples given in paragraph 3 [of the 1978 Leeds/Blondie agreement] of the types of income sources are by way of example and state, 'Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, it is understood that you are entitled to a commission on all of our earnings derived from records and tapes, writing and composing musical compositions, music publishing, personal appearances, television, radio commercials, merchandising and endorsements.'” But Justice Singh then emphasized: “Conspicuously absent from the Termination Agreement is a specific commission rate that would apply to the sale of statutory recapture rights.” Denying Leeds' summary judgment motion, Judge Singh concluded that the Leeds/Blondie agreement, “when read as a whole is ambiguous ' [T]his Court finds that there are genuine issue of material fact'.” Leeds v. Harry, 157749/13.


Grant of Exclusive Right to Use Four Seasons Band Member's “Biography” for Jersey Boys Also Transferred Copyright in His Autobiography Manuscript

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Law Firms are Reducing Redundant Real Estate by Bringing Support Services Back to the Office Image

A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

Bit Parts Image

Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights

Risks of “Baseball Arbitration” in Resolving Real Estate Disputes Image

“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.

Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel Image

'Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel is a continuation of the discussion of client expectations and the disconnect that often occurs. And although the outside attorneys should be pursuing how inside-counsel actually think, inside counsel should make an effort to impart this information without waiting to be asked.