Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The old adage “use it or lose it” applies at every stage of a Chapter 11 case. In the interest of finality, strict deadlines for filing claims, opposing motions, assuming leases, and performing myriad other tasks can impose onerous consequences on parties who fail to heed them. Nowhere is this seemingly harsh ' but essential ' reality more evident than in the ongoing saga of a group of three holders of gift cards, totaling $225.00 in value, issued by the now-defunct Borders bookstore chain. After nearly three years of litigation, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals recently affirmed a district court order dismissing as equitably moot the gift card holders' appeals from an assortment of bankruptcy court orders, and expressly clarified for the first time that the doctrine of equitable mootness applies in liquidating Chapter 11 cases, not just reorganizations. In re BGI, Inc., f/k/a Borders Group, Inc., 772 F.3d 102 (2d Cir. 2014). As a result, the three gift card holders, who waited until seven months after the bar date to attempt to file proofs of claim and move to certify a class of other gift card holders, and who never opposed confirmation or sought to stay the effectiveness of Borders' Chapter 11 plan, are simply too late.
Background
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
A common question that commercial landlords and tenants face is which of them is responsible for a repair to the subject premises. These disputes often center on whether the repair is "structural" or "nonstructural."