Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Those of us who are members of the “baby boom generation,” or the “children of the Sixties,” have witnessed half a century of evolution in the world of family law. When many of us entered high school, the only ground for divorce in New York state, for instance, was also a criminal act ' adultery. By the time we graduated college, our legislature had added abandonment, as well as cruel and inhuman treatment, as additional grounds to enable previously “trapped” spouses to escape bad marriages. Like Chicken Little of our childhoods, crying, “the sky is falling, the sky is falling,” critics of this sea change in our approach to divorce proclaimed the demise of marriage as an institution that was a foundation of our society.
Today, few would question the right of our citizens to terminate the “bonds of matrimony” (a phrase that itself alludes to indentured servitude). For some 40 years, doomsayers managed to prevent New York from joining the No Fault Divorce movement that had begun in California. The cataclysm that opponents predicted when Irretrievable Breakdown of the Marriage Relationship was added as a basis for divorce in 2010 has yet to be witnessed; no calamity has befallen the people of New York, just as none occurred back in 1966. The perplexing and frustrating complexities that pervaded fault-based divorce gave way to a result-oriented process that has muffled the accusations that often formed a roadblock to reasoned solutions of issues such as child custody, division of marital property, child support and spousal maintenance. While judges still are called upon to act as referees, they are no longer compelled to participate in the soap opera that grounds trials presented to them.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.