Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Circuit Court Reinstates Dealer's Defamation Claims Against Manufacturer
In Sleepy's LLC v. Select Comfort Wholesale Corporation, Bus. Franchise Guide '15,466 (2nd Cir. Feb. 27, 2015), the Second Circuit reinstated a dealer's slander claims against a manufacturer. After the dealer had received reports that the manufacturer's sales staff was making defamatory comments about the dealer and its products, it hired secret shoppers to investigate. The manufacturer's sales staff allegedly then made defamatory comments to the secret shoppers during their investigations. Sleepy's serves as a reminder that manufacturers must properly train their sales staff about the risk of defamation liability, including instruction on the difference between what is permissible puffing/sales talk and what is not.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.